Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-3517U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1894 days newer than Core i7-3517U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3517U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i7-3517U - 198 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3517U - 32 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-3517U
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3517U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
