Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2167 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 18% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-2860QM - 170 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2860QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |