Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-2820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3405 days newer than Core i7-2820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 37% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-2820QM - 194 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2820QM - 20 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£253.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £253.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2820QM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |