Buy on Amazon
£349.98
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $359
Availability
MSRP in USD: $359
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-14700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1923 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 482 vs 408 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £349.98 vs £599.99
- Up to 50% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £0.73 vs £1.47 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
482
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£349.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-14700F Desktop Processor 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) up to 5.4 GHz
Buy for £349.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF 12 Core/24 Threads Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Processor
Buy for £599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 12 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
