Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-12700 is 635 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900F - 673 vs 592 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900F - £0.37 vs £0.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - £246.78 vs £250.97
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700 - 20 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
673
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£250.97
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £250.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19664 minutes ago
Buy for £246.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19664 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |