Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G3900 - 160 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - £19.99 vs £217.94
- Up to 90% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-10700F - £0.13 vs £1.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £217.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |