Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 97 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 266 vs 262 FPS
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £108.88 vs £437.44
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 24 vs 6 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75691 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
262
98.49624060150376%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£437.44
24%
Buy for £437.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75691 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |