Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 654 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G3930 - 159 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - £39.99 vs £188.88
- Up to 78% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-9400 - £0.26 vs £1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
151
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |