Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400T outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400T is 944 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Performs up to 8% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G3900 - 257 vs 239 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
239
92.99610894941634%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £128.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6519 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
52.86624203821656%
Multi-Core
992
25.540679711637488%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |