Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400T outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400T is 1756 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than FX-9590 - 118 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 8 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
112
94.91525423728814%
Value, £/FPS
£1.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£141
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £141 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6494 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |