Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 2597 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - £141.0 vs £172.38
- Up to 15% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - £0.63 vs £0.74 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-9590 - 234 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
224
95.72649572649573%
Value, £/FPS
£0.63/FPS
100%
Price, £
£141
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £141 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1650 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
234
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.74/FPS
85.13513513513513%
Price, £
£172.38
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for £172.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1650 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |