Buy on Amazon
£156.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 275 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - 131 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - £49.99 vs £156.85
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-8400 Retail - (1151/Hex Core/2.80GHz/9MB/Coffee Lake/65W/Graphics)
Buy for £156.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74115 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930 Retail - (1151/Dual Core/2.90GHz/2MB/Kabylake/51W/Graphics) - BX80677G3930
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
44.93717664449372%
Multi-Core
1043
21.96714406065712%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
