Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1949 days newer than Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 23% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-4670T - 48 vs 39 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 24 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
48
100%
Value, £/FPS
£12.5/FPS
100%
Price, £
£599.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |