Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i5-4250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1528 days newer than Core i5-4250U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4250U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4250U - 127 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4250U - 24 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4250U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |