Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1918 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Rust than Core i5-3340M - 161 vs 157 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-3340M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
