Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 1554 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 10% better in Borderlands 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 241 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £173.97 vs £351.64
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400 - 24 vs 16 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for £173.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
219
90.87136929460581%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£351.64
49%
Buy for £351.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 339 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
55.70616528202886%
Multi-Core
7454
71.92203782323428%
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |