Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600K is 1547 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 126 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £199.5 vs £315.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £1.58 vs £3.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 24 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
126
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.58/FPS
100%
Price, £
£199.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |