Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Warcraft than Core i9-10900K - 200 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - £132.79 vs £449.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-10900K - £0.66 vs £2.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
200
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.66/FPS
100%
Price, £
£132.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18873 minutes ago
Buy for £449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18873 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |