Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £132.79 vs £499.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-13900K - £1.05 vs £3.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 8% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-11400F - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
127
92%
Value, £/FPS
£1.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£132.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15594 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
137
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.65/FPS
28%
Price, £
£499.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for £499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15593 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |