Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £99.74 vs £384.49
- Up to 71% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £0.53 vs £1.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 12% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-11400F - 210 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
187
89%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£99.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £99.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11303 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
210
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.83/FPS
28%
Price, £
£384.49
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for £384.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11303 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |