Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1840 - 244 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - £49.95 vs £168.88
- Up to 68% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-10600 - £0.22 vs £0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
244
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.69/FPS
31%
Price, £
£168.88
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for £168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
230
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |