Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1213 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - £97.01 vs £123.29
- Up to 21% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-7600K - £0.26 vs £0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-10400F - 378 vs 369 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
369
97.61904761904762%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£97.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £97.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
378
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
78.78787878787878%
Price, £
£123.29
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for £123.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |