Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF and the cheaper Core i5-10400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - £98.8 vs £119.95
- Up to 16% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-10600KF - £0.81 vs £0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-10400F - 125 vs 122 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2469 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.96/FPS
84%
Price, £
£119.95
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |