Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1115 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 1600X - 175 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - £97.01 vs £99.97
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £97.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 232 minutes ago
Buy for £99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 232 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
78.09457579972184%
Multi-Core
4766
82.87254390540775%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |