Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1750 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 1600X - 205 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - £89.38 vs £178.58
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 58 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76533 minutes ago
Buy for £89.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76532 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
50.47191011235955%
Multi-Core
4766
63.91310178355907%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |