Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 840 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3930 - 275 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - £29.99 vs £108.88
- Up to 70% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-9100F - £0.12 vs £0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
256
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |