Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 604 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 166 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 62 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-8300 - £49.95 vs £188.88
- Up to 73% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-8300 - £0.31 vs £1.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 8 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
163
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |