Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 1385 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 22% better in Rust than Celeron G1840 - 190 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-8300 - £49.95 vs £188.88
- Up to 68% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-8300 - £0.32 vs £0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-8300 - 53 vs 62 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
156
82%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
62 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |