Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1785 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - £176.66 vs £457.34
- Up to 58% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-13900 - £1.17 vs £2.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 62 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Core i3-8300 - 164 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
151
92%
Value, £/FPS
£1.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£176.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £176.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3405 minutes ago
Buy for £457.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |