Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2154 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £188.88 vs £514.33
- Up to 45% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-14900F - £1.07 vs £1.94 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 51% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-8300 - 265 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
176
66%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
265
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.94/FPS
55%
Price, £
£514.33
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for £514.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
62 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |