Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1686 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £176.66 vs £454.02
- Up to 45% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-13900K - £0.93 vs £1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 62 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 42% better in Rust than Core i3-8300 - 269 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
190
70%
Value, £/FPS
£0.93/FPS
100%
Price, £
£176.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £176.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 806 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
269
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.69/FPS
55%
Price, £
£454.02
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for £454.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 806 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |