Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1126 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 62 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-8300 - 268 vs 263 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i3-8300 - £69.8 vs £188.88
- Up to 64% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-8300 - £0.26 vs £0.72 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18773 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
268
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £69.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18773 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |