Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2430 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 37 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-4000M - 164 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4000M
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
