Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 320 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-4000M - 154 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i3-4000M - 35 vs 37 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
37 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |