Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 162 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 10% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Athlon 3000G - 145 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
132
91.0344827586207%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£51.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £51.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1644 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
62.1832358674464%
Multi-Core
1975
42.69347168179853%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |