Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1036 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than EPYC 7551P - 160 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 64 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | EPYC |
Comet Lake | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |