Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 883 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G4900 - 159 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 28 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-1125G4
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
28 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
