Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 266 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £65.92 vs £489.35
- Up to 86% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-13900K - £0.12 vs £0.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G6900 - 592 vs 540 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
540
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£65.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £65.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
592
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
14%
Price, £
£489.35
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for £489.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |