Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1189 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 137 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £50.0 vs £599.99
- Up to 92% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £0.36 vs £4.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
137
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£50
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Buy for £599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |