Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 144 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G550 - 230 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
