Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2728 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 16% better in Rust than Celeron G550 - 175 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
175
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.57/FPS
100%
Price, £
£100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |