Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400F is 776 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - £100.0 vs £113.97
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 24% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Athlon 3000G - 146 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Athlon 3000G - £0.78 vs £0.85 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13177 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.78/FPS
100%
Price, £
£113.97
87%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £113.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |