Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2403 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G540 - 193 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |