Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 455 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron G3930T - 196 vs 195 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
