Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 826 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £59.75 vs £470.0
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than Celeron G4900 - 206 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75209 minutes ago
Buy for £470 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
35.62753036437247%
Multi-Core
1051
10.478564307078763%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |