Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 1737 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 23% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G4900 - 397 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
397
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.92/FPS
100%
Price, £
£367
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £367 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13899 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |