Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - £59.75 vs £356.66
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G4900 - 112 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Buy for £356.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
36.930455635491604%
Multi-Core
1051
13.203517587939698%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |