Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 601 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G4900 - 209 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
36.15023474178404%
Multi-Core
1051
9.826103216155573%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |