Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1848 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G3930T - 177 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £89.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75668 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
24.629213483146067%
Multi-Core
948
12.712887220061686%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |