Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1207 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 29% better in Dead Island 2 than Celeron G3930T - 156 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £71.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
37.05206220419202%
Multi-Core
948
18.657744538476678%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |